Tag: miscommunication


No Asshole Rule – A Book Review

August 5th, 2010 — 1:35pm

I first heard of the no asshole policy during an interview – “we don’t hire and we don’t have clients, who are assholes.” I loved the idea so when I heard there was book, I had to pick it up from the library. In Robert I. Sutton’s book, The No Asshole Rule: Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn’t, he has a few gems advice thrown in amidst  a plethora of scientific research.

Although, the book intends to facilitate navigating a difficult work environment, his advice can also be used in social media. He quotes Univ. of Michigan’s Karl Weick “Fight as if you are right, listen as if you are wrong.” At Intel they use this model for having constructive arguments in order to help facilitate a better working environment and to lose less time over small emotional arguments. I agree that this is great advice for not only the workplace, but in our everyday interactions.

Of course, I always think about how advice like this can be related back to the wonderful world of the web. Many companies set up Twitter and other social networking accounts to help subdue upset clients, respond to customer inquires, and/or found out how to offer better services or products. I think that anyone who is handling social media should also consider Karl Weick’s advice. One of things many forget to do while online is to really listen to their customers, not just react. Listen as though you are wrong; in the eyes of an upset customer you are.

In this telecommuting world, many meetings are being conducted using information technologies. Sutton’s book references a study by Stanford’s Pamela Hinds and Diane Bailey showing that conflict can be higher and trust lower when information technologies are used rather than face-to-face meetings.  Emails and phone calls provide little information in the form of facial and body language cues and verbal intonations. Without in-person interactions, it is easier for people to create overtly negative opinions of one another. I have longed believed that not meeting in person can lead to more miscommunication. How often have you or a co-worker misread in an email and then had to deal with the consequences? See my blog post: Miscommunication via Email

And one last gem, not related to the internet. A good way to assess an organization or detect whether a co-worker is an “asshole” is to listen for the word we instead of I or me in meetings and conversations.

Comment » | Books, communication

Miscommunication via E-mail

June 21st, 2010 — 8:28pm
I recently told a friend of mine about my blog. His first reaction was “so an example would be when you e-mail someone to diffuse a potential argument at work.” My response was one of surprise. I've encountered, more times than not, when e-mail can cause miscommunication rather than solve a communication issue. For example, a person's tone can easily be misread in an email. My friend went on to describe how he uses e-mail for clarification after a meeting or other encounter to dissolve a potential argument.

This got me thinking how different people view e-mail communication to solve and mitigate problems in the workplace. As people become more reliant on e-mail, I am still a believer that the best way to create relationships and diffuse tense situations is the good old-fashioned way–to talk in person. Whether it's to clarify a situation or schedule an appointment, talking is becoming less and less of a used source of communication. I am definitely going to try to go against the grain and try talking rather than emailing more often when possible.

Note: Talking doesn’t require spellcheck!

Posted via email from rachindc’s posterous

1 comment » | communication

Back to top